Arguments for exception in US security discourse

A Discourse Grammar for Processing Arguments in Context

In this paper, we develop a linguistic and conceptual analysis of argument coumpounds, i.e. groups of closely related arguments and their related contexts expressed by means of discourse relations. An implementation in Dislog is presented with an indicative evaluation of the results.

Automatically Identifying the Arguments of Discourse Connectives

Annotating Discourse Connectives And Their Arguments

This paper describes a new, large scale discourse-level annotation project – the Penn Discourse TreeBank (PDTB). We present an approach to annotating a level of discourse structure that is based on identifying discourse connectives and their arguments. The PDTB is being built directly on top of the Penn TreeBank and Propbank, thus supporting the extraction of useful syntactic and semantic featu...

Extended Security Arguments for (Ring) Signature Schemes

The well-known forking lemma by Pointcheval and Stern has been used to prove the security of the so-called generic signature schemes. These signature schemes are obtained via the Fiat-Shamir transform from three-pass identification schemes. A number of five-pass identification protocols have been proposed in the last few years. Extending the forking lemma and the Fiat-Shamir transform would all...

Extended Security Arguments for Signature Schemes

The well-known forking lemma by Pointcheval and Stern has been used to prove the security of the so-called generic signature schemes. These signature schemes are obtained via the Fiat-Shamir transform from three-pass identification schemes. A number of five-pass identification protocols have been proposed in the last few years. Extending the forking lemma and the Fiat-Shamir transform would all...